--- description: Avis sur Onshape : présentation du système, fonctionnalités et tarifs. Obtenez des démos gratuites et comparez ce logiciel avec d'autres applications. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: Onshape | Avis, prix et démonstrations - SoftwareAdvice FR --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels d'estimation du coût du béton](/directory/53/concrete-masonry-software/software) > [Onshape](/software/73467/onshape) # Onshape Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/73467/onshape Page : 1/16\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/73467/onshape?page=2) > Onshape est un système de CAO qui améliore la productivité des concepteurs. Il permet à plusieurs concepteurs d'accéder à la même conception et de travailler simultanément sur celle-ci via des services sur cloud avec n'importe quel téléphone, tablette ou ordinateur. Il empêche la perte de données, le verrouillage de la grille de conception et les plantages, ce qui permet aux concepteurs de fournir le meilleur d'eux-mêmes. Onshape a simplifié le processus de vérification des fichiers et l'édition au sein du contexte. Vous aurez un contrôle total sur les données, car cela vous permet de stocker vos données sur un espace de travail sur cloud sécurisé. Le partage de données est facile et rapide avec Onshape, ce qui permet d'économiser le coût d'un stockage local supplémentaire. Les utilisateurs peuvent voir qui a apporté des modifications à la conception ou au contenu grâce à la fonctionnalité de contrôle et de surveillance des accès. Avec la dernière version d'Onshape, vous ne rencontrerez aucun problème de configuration, d'exploitation ou de compatibilité. > > Conclusion : 357 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.5/5** | 357 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.1/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: PTC - **Pays**: Needham, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 1985 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 1 410,00 € - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Linux (ordinateur), Chromebook (ordinateur), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: allemand, anglais, chinois, français, italien, japonais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Argentine, Australie, Autriche, Belgique, Biélorussie, Bosnie-Herzégovine, Brésil, Canada, Chili, Chine, Colombie, Corée du Sud, Danemark, Espagne, Finlande, France, Grèce, Irlande et 20 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - API - Analyse de conception - Analyse visuelle - Animation - Annotations - Autorisations basées sur les rôles - Bibliothèque de composants - Bibliothèque de contenu - Comparaisons en temps réel - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Design en 3D et modélisation - Dessin 2D - Données de design de fabrication - Fonctions pour fabricants - For Solar Companies - Gestion de la conception - Gestion de la configuration - Gestion de versions - Gestion des changements - Gestion des documents ## Intégrations (11 au total) - Cadasio - Capital X Panel Designer - Duro - ESPRIT - KeyShot - Mastercam - OnScale Solve - OpenBOM - SimScale - SimSolid - SprutCAM ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels d'estimation du coût du béton](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/53/concrete-masonry-software/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels d'estimation du coût du béton](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/53/concrete-masonry-software/software) - [Logiciels de gestion de la construction](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/1722/best-apps/software) - [Logiciels de dimensionnement solaire](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/3865/solar/software) - [Logiciels pour la fabrication](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/4704/manufacturing/software) - [Logiciels de construction](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/4133/construction/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Inventor](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/414123/inventor) — 4.5/5 (278 reviews) 2. [CATIA](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/115806/catia) — 4.6/5 (224 reviews) 3. [Creo](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/410113/creo) — 4.4/5 (126 reviews) 4. [AutoCAD LT](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/422335/autocad-lt) — 4.6/5 (226 reviews) 5. [Autodesk Fusion](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/420072/fusion-360) — 4.5/5 (270 reviews) ## Avis ### "OnShape will impress." — 5.0/5 > **Jason** | *20 juillet 2026* | Agriculture | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Ease of use, performance without the high dollar PC, massive assembly mate reduction, and never losing data. > > **Inconvénients**: 3 Party add-ons vs built in features. Would really like to be able to add reference geometry in assemblies. > > I had heard of OnShape a few years ago and downloaded the app to my phone to briefly check it out. Being 20+ year SolidWorks user, I did pay much attention to it. After getting a chance to interview for a position at a company that was using it, I quickly went through the on-line tutorials in case I had to hit the ground running. I ended up get the position and was able to create over 1850 assemblies, parts, and drawings within a year. I've since created sheet metal parts, machined parts, injection/rotational molds, and 3D printer proto-types. I've created building and site layouts as well. ----- ### "Revolutionary CAD" — 5.0/5 > **Victor** | *20 juillet 2026* | Eau/gaz/électricité | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It's cloud native, the pdm is native, I don't have to rebuild parts and assemblies all the time. I also can use git like versioning schemes, which is an industry first. > > **Inconvénients**: I guess what it's also it's main strength: being completely run on the cloud, which requires an active internet connection. > > Overall we're very happy with, being able to finally implement a pdm tool and increase the collaboration between team members. ----- ### "Works well, wish they hadn't done a bate-n-switch on small users" — 5.0/5 > **Zachary** | *18 octobre 2019* | Production alimentaire | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Really, REALLY slick web interface and mobile app. Designing parts and mechanisms from any computer, just wow\! Quickly sharing, very good version tracking - it's the real deal. > > **Inconvénients**: They started out positioned very nicely for small-time users, 10 private documents, but switched to "public only" free documents at the same time as they aggressively pushed for subscriptions. > > It's still super impressive to me to pull up a model on mobile and show friends/customers how it looks, parts that move. The platform is great, just wish it was a little more generous like at the start. ----- ### "Great for collaboration and easy document management" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *21 juillet 2026* | Énergies renouvelables et environnement | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Document management is convenient in that if you move files around, it does not break assemblies. Revision history is very helpful and being able to revert to an older version or branch from a version is so useful. I love being able to collaborate with others in my organization within a document. I think I also prefer Onshape's mate connector system over the mating features in other CAD software I have used. Onshape support has been efficient and helpful in my experience whenever I have had any issues or questions. > > **Inconvénients**: No feature to be able to bulk export files to have a non-cloud-based backup of files. Performance can be sluggish on occasion. I have not tried using the AI integration much, but when I have, it has not been particularly helpful. > > Since switching to Onshape over a year ago, it has quickly become my go to CAD platform thanks to its clean UI, easy document management, and great training resources and support. I have been very impressed with Onshape's performance, particularly as it is a cloud-based software. I also love that there is a free standard version that I can use for personal projects outside of work. ----- ### "Senior Industrial Designer / Owner" — 5.0/5 > **Ben** | *6 août 2026* | Design | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I value Onshape for its file management, allowing me to create and iterate quickly through versions without the hassle of saving work or losing track of progress. It also helps with live progress updates. The versions, versioning, and branching features stand out to me the most, as they support my rapid design iteration. Not having to save files and dealing with software that doesn't crash are significant advantages. The flexibility and collaboration capabilities are also key reasons why I switched to Onshape. The initial setup was very easy for the most part, even though there was a bit of a learning curve. Overall, it has been a good experience. > > **Inconvénients**: Mating and context editing can be frustrating because parts move around unexpectedly, and I have to constantly update the context in the assembly. The mental model around context editing could benefit from tips and tricks pop-ups or other UI cues to help prevent unwanted parts and therefore reference movements. Versioning and branching can be confusing; the mental model, UI/UX, and training around versioning could be improved. Importing multibody parts or assemblies requires extra steps to prevent them from freely moving. I wish there was a way to easily make all parts rigid when importing. I have tried the "composite body" option, but it doesn't work well. Edge selection is also challenging sometimes as it prioritizes face selection rather than edge selection, making me zoom in and orient parts several times to select the edge. I'm not sure if this is a graphics issue with my display or an Onshape problem. Selecting other sketches while working in a new sketch is cumbersome; I have to exit the command (line circle etc.) to then go back and force the coincident reference a master sketch point, which feels like an extra unnecessary step. Rebuild times could improve. > > Overall this software is a no brainer, it allows for iterative product development across teams, allowing easy and effective collaboration. Onshape continues to update and improve week to week so any issue experienced can be fixed by the Onshape team on the fly. The Onshape team listens and responds well. I chose Onshape because its a software that continues to improve and reacts to users needs. ----- Page : 1/16\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/73467/onshape?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/73467/onshape) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Données structurées