--- description: Avis sur GitHub : présentation du système, fonctionnalités et tarifs. Obtenez des démos gratuites et comparez ce logiciel avec d'autres applications. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: GitHub | Avis, prix et démonstrations - SoftwareAdvice FR --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion du code source](/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) > [GitHub](/software/397820/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/397820/github Page : 1/249\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/397820/github?page=2) > GitHub est une plateforme de gestion de projet et de partage de code qui permet aux utilisateurs de partager leurs codes avec d'autres personnes et de créer/reproduire à l'aide de l'intelligence collective. Le logiciel peut être utilisé pour différents types d'affectations de codage, y compris les codes personnels, open source et commerciaux. Il peut être déployé sur le cloud et sur site. Les utilisateurs peuvent enregistrer toutes les versions de leur code et collaborer avec d'autres utilisateurs en les invitant ou en les marquant avec des @mentions. Les développeurs ont la possibilité de rejoindre des communautés dans lesquelles ils peuvent suivre des projets open source, exploiter des codes déjà créés pour des expériences, faire des suggestions et contribuer à un projet. Toutes les contributions à des projets open source sont enregistrées dans les profils des développeurs. Les entreprises de toutes tailles utilisent GitHub comme outil intégré pour le développement de code. > > Conclusion : 6187 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.8/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.8/5** | 6187 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Microsoft - **Pays**: Redmond, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 1975 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 4,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Windows (sur site), Linux (sur site), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Arabie saoudite, Australie, Autriche, Belgique, Biélorussie, Brésil, Bulgarie, Canada, Chine, Corée du Sud, Croatie, Danemark, Espagne, Estonie, Finlande, France, Hongrie, Inde et 27 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - @mentions - Analyse de code source - Analyse de la vulnérabilité - Analyse de plusieurs langues - Analyse statique - Application mobile - Assurance qualité - Authentification - Authentification à 2 facteurs - Automated Testing - Autorisations basées sur les rôles - Contrôle des sources - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Débogage - Déploiement basé sur le web - Déploiement continu - Développement collaboratif - Développement de logiciel - Développement du code - Environnement de développement intégré ## Intégrations (14 au total) - CircleCI - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion du code source](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de gestion du code source](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) - [Logiciels d'intégration continue](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/4694/continuous-integration/software) - [Logiciels de gestion de projets en ligne](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/436/web-based/software) - [Outils DevOps](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/4380/devops/software) - [Outils SAST](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/4429/sast/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [GitLab](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/28004/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1223 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/4315/jira) — 4.4/5 (15417 reviews) 3. [Wrike](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/3777/wrike-pm) — 4.4/5 (3023 reviews) 4. [ClickUp](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/123064/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4604 reviews) 5. [Zoho Projects](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/392421/zoho-projects) — 4.5/5 (866 reviews) ## Avis ### "Perfect for all sizes of projects" — 5.0/5 > **🧑‍💻 Owain** | *6 avril 2026* | Internet | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I enjoy working with GitHub due to its ease of use and that so many people use it so there are tons of online resources available if you get stuck trying to set something up > > **Inconvénients**: Sometimes swapping between repos can be cumbersome. If you have multiple organisations it's not always a smooth transition between repos > > I enjoy working with GitHub so much that we've recently migrated all our bitbucket repos to GitHub. It's great that we can keep client repos private but still show our activity on our own personal accounts ----- ### "A must-have tool for everyday development" — 5.0/5 > **Daniel** | *19 mai 2026* | Produits alimentaires | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I really enjoy GitHub's clean and intuitive interface, which makes navigation straightforward even for complex projects. The collaborative environment is one of its strongest points — working with my team of four developers feels natural and well-supported. Pull Requests are a feature I use constantly; they make code review organized and transparent, which is essential when coordinating changes across the team. I also love being able to store and deploy my web applications directly from GitHub to other platforms, which streamlines my entire development workflow. > > **Inconvénients**: Merge conflicts can be frustrating. When I'm working simultaneously with a teammate and they push changes, it sometimes overwrites or breaks parts of my project due to conflicting edits. For developers who are still learning version control, this can be especially confusing and time-consuming to resolve. Better real-time conflict warnings or prevention tools would be a great improvement. > > I have been using GitHub for three years, starting back in university and continuing into my professional career as a systems engineer. I use it both individually and as part of a small team to build and manage web applications. Despite the occasional merge conflict headache, GitHub remains my go-to platform for version control, collaboration, and deployment. It has genuinely become an indispensable part of my daily workflow. ----- ### "best code management before microsoft acquisition" — 4.0/5 > **Terry** | *16 mai 2025* | Exploitation minière et métaux | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: best place for code management across different coders, the ability to control access and track issues is perfect for agile projects > > **Inconvénients**: ever since the acquisition from microsoft, github becomes a tool to advertise microsoft products. I have to use microsoft authenticator to log in with stupid 2 factor authentication requirement. ----- ### "Easy and stable place to store codebase." — 5.0/5 > **Indra** | *28 juin 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Version control system is crucial to our team. With the rise of remote work, developers can connect in more ways than ever before and pull requests and code reviews have significantly changed the way developers collaborate. The CI/CD pipelines integration allows for smoother deployments. What I also enjoy is the capacity to manage private repositories which is very important for client specific projects. Access comprehensive documentation, and the platform has a wealth of community resources for addressing issues rapidly. > > **Inconvénients**: The costs can easily accumulate, especially when scaling up team licenses or accessing more advanced features for a medium-sized company such as us. Additionally, the built-in project management features, while useful, are not as extensive or flexible as project management software, which we still use. At times, the workflows may be too complicated for it's intended purpose of junior developers new to the tools. > > As a part of our IT department we use GitHub as a stable platform for collaboration and version control. Especially for our multi-developers workflows, and client based projects. Its costs and sometimes complex interface, however, make it a not one-size-fits-all solution. There are some problems, but its features and community make it an essential part of our development and deployment processes. ----- ### "Reliable Platform for Managing and Sharing Code" — 4.0/5 > **ABDUL** | *13 juin 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: GitHub offers a wide range of features for source code management, collaboration, and project tracking. The setup process is simple, and getting started with repositories is straightforward. The platform is easy to use for basic tasks while still providing advanced capabilities for experienced developers. Features such as pull requests, branches, issue tracking, and GitHub Actions help streamline development workflows. The documentation and community support are also very helpful when troubleshooting issues. > > **Inconvénients**: Some advanced features have a learning curve, especially for users who are new to Git and version control concepts. The reporting and analytics features are relatively basic compared to some specialized project management tools. Certain enterprise and team features may also be costly for smaller organizations. > > My experience with GitHub has been positive for both personal and collaborative development projects. From a build and development perspective, it provides a reliable environment for managing code changes and collaborating with team members. The setup process was quick, and the platform integrates well with many development tools and CI/CD workflows. In terms of ease of use, everyday tasks such as creating repositories, committing code, and reviewing pull requests are intuitive. The available features cover most software development needs, and the platform continues to improve over time. For customer support, I have mainly relied on the documentation and community resources, which are extensive and useful. Regarding value for money, the free tier offers significant functionality, making it a strong choice for individual developers and small teams. While reporting capabilities are not its strongest area, GitHub remains an excellent platform for source code management and software development. ----- Page : 1/249\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/397820/github?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/397820/github) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Données structurées