--- description: Avis sur Wrike : présentation du système, fonctionnalités et tarifs. Obtenez des démos gratuites et comparez ce logiciel avec d'autres applications. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: Wrike | Avis, prix et démonstrations - SoftwareAdvice FR --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion des ressources](/directory/1296/resource-management/software) > [Wrike](/software/3777/wrike-pm) # Wrike Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/3777/wrike-pm Page : 1/123\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/3777/wrike-pm?page=2) > Wrike est une plateforme cloud de gestion de projet pour les équipes de plus de 20 personnes, adaptée aux grandes entreprises et aux PME. Elle prend en charge le travail à distance pour diverses équipes. Cette solution est fournie avec des diagrammes de Gantt, des calendriers, une vue de charge de travail pour la gestion des ressources, des tableaux de bord personnalisés et des mises à jour en temps réel. Celle-ci permet de structurer à l'aide de dossiers, de projets et de tâches, ainsi que de l'affectation automatique en fonction de l'état des tâches. Wrike for Marketers est un produit séparé doté de modèles sur mesure, d'outils de vérification et d'une extension Adobe. Wrike s'intègre à une variété d'outils, notamment Salesforce, Dropbox, Slack et Adobe Creative Cloud, tout en offrant une API (Application Programming Interface) ouverte. Wrike convient aux équipes informatiques de marketing, opérationnelles et créatives de moyenne à grande envergure. La solution est tarifée par utilisateur et repose sur la base d'un abonnement mensuel. > > Conclusion : 3042 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.4/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.4/5** | 3042 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 80% | (8/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Wrike - **Pays**: San Jose, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2007 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 10,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Prix**: Gratuit : Une simple liste de tâches partagées pour les petites équipes Gratuit pour 5 utilisateur Professionnel : Planification de projets et collaboration complètes - À partir de $ 9.80 / utilisateur / mois Business: Gestion renforcée du travail avec personnalisation et rapports de la direction À partir de $ 24,80 / utilisateur / mois Entreprise : Gestion complète du travail avec contrôles de sécurité et administratifs avancés - Offre personnalisée - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: allemand, anglais, chinois, chinois traditionnel, coréen, danois, espagnol, français, indonésien, italien, japonais, norvégien, néerlandais, polonais, portugais, russe, suédois, tchèque, turc, ukrainien, vietnamien - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Albanie, Algérie, Allemagne, Andorre, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua-et-Barbuda, Arabie saoudite, Argentine, Arménie, Aruba, Australie, Autriche, Azerbaïdjan, Bahamas, Bahreïn, Bangladesh, Barbade, Belgique et 202 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - @mentions - AI Copilot - API - Accès et contrôle à distance - Accès invité - Accès mobile - Achats et réceptions - Actions découlant d'un événement - Affichage de page unique - Agrégation de données - Alertes de risque - Alertes en temps réel - Alertes mobiles - Alertes/Notifications - Alerts/Escalation - Allocation de ressources - Allocation et planification des ressources - Analyse de la productivité - Analyse des données de jeu - Analyse des dépenses ## Intégrations (133 au total) - AWS Lambda - Adobe Campaign - Adobe Creative Cloud - Airbrake - Airtable - Amazon Cognito - Amazon Lex - Amazon S3 - Anaplan - Apache Kafka - Asana - Ascent ERP - BambooHR - Basecamp - BigCommerce ... et 118 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion des ressources](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/1296/resource-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de tableau blanc](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/4597/whiteboard/software) - [Logiciels de création de formulaires](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/4464/form-builder/software) - [Logiciels de gestion du personnel](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/374/workforce-management-software/software) - [Logiciels IWMS (Integrated Workplace Management System)](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/4752/iwms-software/software) - [Logiciels de gestion immobilière](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/4672/property/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [monday AI Work Platform](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/131008/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6121 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/4315/jira) — 4.4/5 (15495 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/5576/asana) — 4.5/5 (13740 reviews) 4. [Clockify](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/355240/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9270 reviews) 5. [Trello](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/430585/trello) — 4.5/5 (23630 reviews) ## Avis ### "Great Workflow automation software for beginners" — 5.0/5 > **Arun** | *9 août 2026* | Gestion de l'enseignement | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Their ui and ease of use as someone who just started using CRM, Wrike made me feel this workflow management much familiar compared to other tools i have tried. > > **Inconvénients**: The customer support was little bit off, although right now i have dedicated account manager, so no issues. > > My overall experience was really good with wrike, been using it for workflow automation for our company, and wrike was very easy as someone who just started using workflow automation. ----- ### "Powerful project management tool with excellent task tracking" — 5.0/5 > **Karol** | *4 août 2026* | Marketing et publicité | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Wrike made it much easier to keep projects and tasks organized across the team. I liked being able to assign tasks, set due dates, add comments, and track progress in one place. It improved visibility into ongoing work and helped everyone stay aligned, especially while working remotely. Once our team became familiar with the platform, it was straightforward to use for day-to-day project management. > > **Inconvénients**: The biggest challenge was organizing the workspace. When we first implemented Wrike, our team wasn't very familiar with the platform, so we created folders and projects in a way that didn't scale well. As more projects were added, we ended up with many layers of folders and subfolders, making navigation more confusing and reducing visibility. Reorganizing everything later was difficult because the workspace was already actively being used. I also think there is a learning curve when setting up an effective project structure from the beginning. > > Overall, I had a positive experience with Wrike. It was a reliable project management tool that helped our team collaborate, track tasks, and stay on schedule. I didn't experience any major bugs or performance issues during my time using it. The platform offers good value considering the features it provides, although teams should spend time planning their workspace structure before rolling it out. I didn't personally interact with customer support or use the invoicing features, so I can't comment on those areas, but for project and task management, Wrike met our team's needs well. ----- ### "Great but quite specialized" — 3.0/5 > **Utilisateur anonyme** | *19 juillet 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 5.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Perfect for complicated project management but it works well only for the PMs while the rest people within the company struggle to use it/ keep up > > **Inconvénients**: We get quite some complaints from the peripheral teams that it’s hard to use and keep up with. There is some kind of debate about its value since half the employees don’t want it.. ----- ### "Powerful Project Management Platform with Excellent Visibility and Collaboration" — 4.0/5 > **Jonas** | *28 juillet 2026* | Matériaux de construction | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Wrike excels at providing clear visibility across projects, tasks, and team workloads. Features such as customizable dashboards, Gantt charts, and automated workflows make it easy to track progress and keep projects moving forward. The ability to assign tasks, set dependencies, attach files, and maintain discussions directly within each task helps reduce email clutter and keeps all project information in one place. We have found the reporting tools particularly useful for monitoring deadlines, identifying bottlenecks, and giving stakeholders real-time updates on project status. Once configured, Wrike becomes a highly effective platform for improving collaboration, accountability, and overall project organization. > > **Inconvénients**: While Wrike is a powerful project management platform, some features can be confusing and require a significant learning curve for new users. The hierarchy between Spaces, Folders, Projects, and Tasks is not always intuitive, making it easy to lose track of where information is stored. Custom workflows and request forms are highly flexible, but setting them up correctly can be challenging without prior experience. Reporting and dashboard customization can also feel overwhelming due to the number of available options, and users may need to navigate through multiple menus to find specific settings or project views. Although these features provide tremendous flexibility, they can make the platform feel overly complex for teams that only need straightforward task and project tracking. > > Overall, my experience with Wrike has been very positive. The platform has significantly improved project visibility, communication, and accountability across teams by providing a centralized location for tasks, schedules, documents, and status updates. Features such as customizable dashboards, automated workflows, and Gantt charts make it easy to monitor project progress and identify potential delays before they become larger issues. For example, project managers can quickly see overdue tasks, resource workloads, and upcoming milestones without having to compile information from multiple sources. Wrike has also improved collaboration by allowing team members to assign tasks, share files, track discussions, and receive notifications within the same workspace. This helps reduce reliance on lengthy email chains and ensures that project information remains organized and accessible. While there is a learning curve associated with some of the more advanced customization and reporting features, the benefits of increased transparency, streamlined processes, and improved project control have made Wrike a valuable tool for managing both routine work and complex projects. Overall, I would recommend Wrike to organizations looking for a flexible and feature-rich project management solution. ----- ### "Easy-to-Navigate UI with Responsive Performance and Time-Saving Integrations" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *15 août 2026* | Hôpitaux et soins de santé | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: As part of Cigna, I’ve been using Wrike for the last 8 months. It was a very new software for me at first, but I really like the UI design and find it very easy to navigate. One improvement I’d suggest is in the Gantt Chart: I’d like dependencies to be easier to create, because sometimes I run into issues when connecting one dependency to another. I also appreciate that it already offers integrations with multiple enterprise software tools, which reduces a lot of manual work. I’ve found it to be responsive in both the Windows application and the web version. It’s also much cheaper than other software, for example Smartsheet, which saves a lot of money for the organization. As an admin, I’ve onboarded multiple users and found it very easy to provide KT to new users. From my own experience, I was also new to the application, and it was still easy to utilize the functionality. Cigna AI has not been enabled yet, but I’ve tried a few functions as a beta tester. Summarizing and automating workflows felt much smoother compared to other competitive applications in the market. > > **Inconvénients**: I’d like the Gantt chart UI to be improved. When I create dependencies, sometimes it’s hard to track the dependency path because the lines overlap and get superimposed on each other. > > As a admin in Cigna and a technical product owner of the Wrike I like how easy to use, with an intuitive design that’s quick to learn. It also reduced our licence costs, and the premium support per user made the decision easier. ----- Page : 1/123\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/3777/wrike-pm?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/3777/wrike-pm) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Données structurées