--- description: Avis sur Greenhouse : présentation du système, fonctionnalités et tarifs. Obtenez des démos gratuites et comparez ce logiciel avec d'autres applications. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: Greenhouse | Avis, prix et démonstrations - SoftwareAdvice FR --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de RH en ligne](/directory/369/web-based-hr-software/software) > [Greenhouse](/software/3501/greenhouse) # Greenhouse Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/3501/greenhouse Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/3501/greenhouse?page=2) > Greenhouse est le principal logiciel de recrutement pour les entreprises en pleine expansion. Des milliers d'entreprises parmi les plus performantes telles que DoorDash, Betterment, Wayfair et DocuSign utilisent Greenhouse pour optimiser tous les aspects du recrutement et de l'intégration. Grâce à son approche efficace en matière de recrutement, à une gamme complète de logiciels et de services et un vaste écosystème d'intégration, votre entreprise sera prête à embaucher pour préparer l'avenir. Greenhouse Recruiting favorise des interactions positives avec les candidats à chaque étape, réduit la charge administrative et mobilise tous les membres de l'équipe de recrutement. Greenhouse est également leader du secteur des outils de diversité, d'équité et d'inclusion, contribuant ainsi à atténuer les préjugés et à créer un processus de recrutement plus équitable. Les clients de Greenhouse constatent un engagement moyen de 85 % à l'échelle de l'entreprise, une réduction de 27 % de la durée moyenne du recrutement et de 31 % du coût moyen par embauche. Avec Greenhouse, vous pouvez : - Élaborer et mettre en œuvre un excellent plan de recrutement. - Responsabiliser les recruteurs, les responsables du recrutement, les personnes menant les entretiens et les référents pour qu'ils puissent jouer leur rôle avec des niveaux d'autorisation uniques. - Identifier les sources les plus performantes et optimiser votre approche. - Réduire le temps nécessaire pour recruter en gagnant à chaque interaction. - Gérer chaque point de contact avec les candidats. - Utiliser l'analytique pour générer des améliorations continues. Lorsque votre entreprise choisit d'utiliser Greenhouse, elle acquiert plus que de simples logiciels. Vous choisissez d'investir selon le principe que le recrutement est le facteur le plus important de la réussite de votre entreprise. Vous bénéficiez du soutien d'une équipe passionnée par sa mission. Et vous vous donnez les moyens d'une entreprise engagée dans la recherche sans relâche d'un meilleur recrutement. > > Conclusion : 765 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.5/5** | 765 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 80% | (8/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Greenhouse Software - **Pays**: New York, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2012 ## Contexte commercial - **Public cible**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Linux (ordinateur), Chromebook (ordinateur) - **Langues**: allemand, anglais, chinois, espagnol, français, italien - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Arabie saoudite, Argentine, Australie, Autriche, Belgique, Bermudes, Brésil, Bulgarie, Canada, Chili, Chine, Chypre, Colombie, Corée du Sud, Croatie, Danemark, Espagne, Estonie et 48 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - API - Accès mobile - Alertes/Notifications - Analyse de CV - Autorisations basées sur les rôles - Base de données de CV - Base de données des employés - CRM - Cabinets de recrutement - Candidate Sourcing - Champs personnalisables - Contrôle du processus d'approbation - Facturation - Formulaires électroniques - Gestion d'orientation du flux de travail - Gestion de la communication - Gestion de la conformité - Gestion des applications - Gestion des calendriers - Gestion des candidats ## Intégrations (203 au total) - AccuSourceHR - Accurate - Adaface - Alooba Assess - Alva Labs - AmazingHiring - Appcast - Assessio - Asurint - Background Check Platform - BambooHR - BarRaiser - Beamery - BetterCloud - Broadbean ... et 188 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de RH en ligne](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/369/web-based-hr-software/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de RH en ligne](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/369/web-based-hr-software/software) - [Logiciels de recrutement](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/372/recruiting-software/software) - [Logiciels ATS](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/321/applicant-tracking-software/software) - [Logiciels onboarding](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/1396/employee-onboarding/software) - [Logiciels de RH pour ONG](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/directory/367/nonprofit/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [BambooHR](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/27196/bamboohr-payroll) — 4.6/5 (3547 reviews) 2. [Paylocity](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/4537/web-pay) — 4.3/5 (1928 reviews) 3. [Paycom](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/32588/paycom) — 4.4/5 (1386 reviews) 4. [Rippling](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/410674/rippling) — 4.9/5 (4860 reviews) 5. [ZipRecruiter](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/19531/ziprecruiter) — 4.2/5 (10949 reviews) ## Avis ### "A solid ATS, but the experience depends heavily on setup and permissions" — 3.0/5 > **Flavia** | *10 août 2026* | Recrutement | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Greenhouse was the first ATS I used with meaningful automation and integrations, after previously working with much simpler systems. Its LinkedIn and email integrations made candidate management and communication easier, while its dashboards provided useful visibility into recruitment activity and the hiring process. Overall, it offered a more structured and efficient recruiting workflow than the basic ATS platforms I had used before. > > **Inconvénients**: Greenhouse does not offer native candidate outreach sequences, which limits its usefulness for sourcing and managing follow-up campaigns. Recruiters may need to use a separate tool for automated, multi-step outreach. My access as a recruiter was also quite limited because many features were only available to administrators or managers. This sometimes made it difficult to manage processes independently or take full advantage of the platform. > > I used Greenhouse for over a year and found it to be a good, reliable ATS for managing candidates and supporting a structured hiring process. Its integrations, automation, dashboards, and communication tools were a significant improvement over the simpler systems I had previously used. At the same time, my experience may not represent everything Greenhouse can offer because the platform did not appear to be fully configured for advanced recruiting workflows at my company. Access restrictions also meant that recruiters could not use many features without administrator or manager permissions. Overall, it handled the core ATS functions well, but my experience with it was less flexible and advanced than with some newer platforms. ----- ### "Strong ATS for scaling recruiting teams, major upgrade from legacy systems" — 5.0/5 > **Jolene** | *16 avril 2026* | Santé, bien-être et fitness | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Greenhouse has been a major operational upgrade for our recruiting team. The biggest wins are structured interviewing, scheduling, and overall pipeline visibility. The scorecard system allows us to standardize hiring across markets and reduce bias, which was a major gap in our previous ATS. Automated reminders for interview feedback have improved hiring manager accountability and speed. Scheduling is seamless compared to legacy systems. Candidates can self-schedule, which cuts down on back-and-forth and improves time to fill. The CRM functionality is also a strong addition. We can proactively build pipelines, nurture candidates, and run targeted outreach campaigns instead of relying solely on inbound applicants. Reporting and integrations are another highlight. Being able to connect Greenhouse to tools like Google Sheets and pull real-time data has made it much easier to track hiring metrics and communicate with leadership. Overall, it brings structure, visibility, and scalability to the recruiting process. > > **Inconvénients**: There is a learning curve, especially for hiring managers who are not used to structured interviews or consistent scorecard usage. Adoption requires training and reinforcement. Customization can sometimes feel rigid. While structure is a strength, certain workflows or reporting views require workarounds. The reporting is powerful, but not always intuitive out of the box. You need to spend time building dashboards or exporting data to get exactly what you want. Cost can also be a consideration, particularly for smaller teams, though it is justified if you are hiring at scale. > > Our experience with Greenhouse has been very positive. We implemented it to replace a limited ATS that lacked scheduling, automation, and reliable reporting. Since switching, we have significantly improved hiring efficiency, candidate experience, and internal alignment with hiring managers. It has allowed us to scale recruiting across multiple markets while maintaining consistency in how we evaluate candidates. Structured interviews, automation, and better pipeline visibility have been the biggest drivers of impact. It is not a plug-and-play solution. You need clear processes, training, and ownership to get the most out of it. But if implemented correctly, it becomes a powerful system that supports both high-volume hiring and more strategic roles. ----- ### "Reliable platform" — 5.0/5 > **Rachel** | *19 mars 2026* | Services aux consommateurs | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: it's really easy to find great new candidates for new positions and streamlines the process to make hiring easier > > **Inconvénients**: it's a little flat and could use a more modern look sometimes but it foes get the job down either way > > Super easy to use, nothing really complicated that I've come across, really useful for hiring for new positions ----- ### "Honest review from Built" — 3.0/5 > **Ashley** | *22 avril 2026* | Services financiers | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: -Structured Hiring Foundation: It provides a framework for objective, signal-based interviewing that aligns with our high-performance culture. -Robust API Ecosystem: The ability to pull data via the BI Connector and Harvest API is critical for our shift toward an AI-native "Intelligence Layer". -Source of Truth: It serves as a reliable system of record -Customization: The ability to build specific role scorecards ensures we maintain a high bar for talent even as we scale. > > **Inconvénients**: -Fraud \& Spam Vulnerability: The 97%+ fraud rate in Engineering applications is a massive operational tax. I am disappointed that solving a baseline security and quality issue requires a significant financial upgrade to "Real Talent". -Automation Gaps: Native scheduling still lacks the complexity needed for an AI-native function, currently consuming 1,000–1,700 hours of team capacity annually. -Bulk Action Friction: The inability to easily mass-reject candidates after applying specific filters (required skills, etc.) creates unnecessary manual work. -UI Inefficiencies: Small but frequent friction points, such as only saving the last 5 pasted URLs, add up to significant time waste when trying to personalize scheduling confirmations with Hiring Manager LinkedIn profiles. -We don't have a talent coordinator or anyone in recruiting ops, meaning our recruiters have to do all the manual setup. Greenhouse is extremely "click-heavy." It takes a lot of manual effort to set up a job properly, or to do something as simple as pulling up a job description, and its internal reporting often requires exporting data to Excel to get real insights. > > Greenhouse is the best structured hiring system of record on the market, but it currently feels more like a static database than a proactive system of action. For a team like ours at Built, currently moving to a 65% strategic/35% reactive split, we find ourselves having to build external AI orchestration or buy third-party tools to handle what should be native: high-volume fraud prevention, complex auto-scheduling, and bulk workflow efficiency. It provides the essential data foundation, but the manual 'tax' required to operate it daily is becoming a bottleneck for a modern, lean People team. ----- ### "Continuing to innovate and improve" — 5.0/5 > **Rosa** | *23 avril 2026* | Agriculture | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The tool is easy to use and has great functionality to create custom fields and filter from these. The bulk actions are excellent. Just waiting on bulk hire. > > **Inconvénients**: The activity could be better displayed to keep accurate reports of communication. The comments section is fine but you can easily loose the communication. It would be better to display this in a more succent way. > > Really positive and great to see the improvement in account management. Given the amount we spend on this tool, this was definitely lagging until this year. ----- Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/3501/greenhouse?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.fr/software/3501/greenhouse) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Données structurées