BrowserStack

Avantages

The ease of use while integrating with our frameworks and how easily scalable it is.

Inconvénients

Support can be better in case of time-critical situations.

Avantages

Best thing is performance & speed. It spins up a devices quite quickly. There is no lag unlike other apps. Additionally lot of devices are available, probably everything under a sun. I really liked a idea of adding a device and able to perform testing simultaneously on 2 devices.

Inconvénients

I will personally like browser stack to have keep me signed in as max as app/website allows when I switch over devices or at least when I reuse same device/browser again.
Also while testing on ios mobile devices using test simulator, I need to enter apple id again & again which is bit irritating.

Will appreciate if user management screen can have ability to download the list of users

Avantages

I like the ability to test on multiple platforms and browser combinations.

Inconvénients

The low code automation test tool relies on record and play back and screen capture and compare which is traditionally quite brittle.

Avantages

Reliable platform and using real devices

Inconvénients

Offshore servers causing the problem since you don't know on which server you will be executing the test. Lack of customer support

Avantages

I want to share more about this low code tool for now:
Gen AI self-healing capabilities.
Re-run & parallel execution capabilities.
integration with other tools.

Inconvénients

monolithic architecture.
launch time of devices.
variation of device versions.

Avantages

ease of use, amount of region and devices, security

Inconvénients

would like to see advancements in the ADA identification space. I believe we tested your tool a few years ago yet imagine it has advanced. Will reach out to our customer success mgr to get a refresh.

Avantages

lates devices, quick testing easy availability.
Multi browser

Inconvénients

sometime sow response(other than network issue)

Avantages

I find the BrowserStack UI to be quite intuitive and pleasing to th eeye.

Inconvénients

The documentation can be a bit difficult to navigate at times.

Avantages

BrowserStack offers an impressive range of browsers, operating systems, and devices, ensuring comprehensive testing across various platforms. The ability to test on real devices is a huge advantage. This provides a more accurate representation of how apps will run in real-world scenarios, which may alleviate issues that might be missed with emulators or simulators.

Inconvénients

More access and longer parallel access to real device testing would be a great compliment to the student developer benefits from github.

Avantages

Availibility of various and latest devices at one place

Inconvénients

the slowness whenever one scroll the response is slow which makes it slow to test and is time consuming.

Avantages

BrowserStack is awesome! It's like having a bunch of phones and computers right at your fingertips. I can test my websites on all sorts of devices without actually owning them. It's super easy to use - just pick a device and boom, you're testing. It catches those annoying bugs that only pop up on certain browsers, which is a huge time-saver. The live testing feature is really cool too. It's like magic - I can see changes in real-time across different devices. Definitely makes my job way easier!

Inconvénients

The only thing that bugs me a bit is that sometimes it can be slow to load, especially when I'm in a rush. But honestly, it's not a big deal considering how much time it saves me overall. The pros totally outweigh this tiny hiccup.

Avantages

It's extremely easy to use, has variety of features, and most importantly almost all existing devices.

Inconvénients

It would be an awesome adition if we could also get several instances of Linux OS.

Avantages

The platform is user-friendly and integrates seamlessly with popular test automation frameworks like Selenium, Appium

Inconvénients

Some times the responsiveness of virtual devices can be slow, particularly when there are network bandwidth limitations​.

Avantages

What I liked most about BrowserStack is the ability to test on actual devices. The wide range of devices and browsers they offer ensures that I can catch issues that might only appear on specific setups. The interface is user-friendly, making it easy to navigate and run tests. Additionally, the performance is reliable, with minimal lag even when testing on high-demand devices.

Inconvénients

The least favorable aspect of BrowserStack for me is the cost. It can get quite expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers. Also, sometimes the devices take a bit longer to become available during peak times, which can slow down the testing process.

Avantages

1) Vast variety of devices, major plus
2) User friendly UI
3) Easy way to upload binaries for testing

Inconvénients

1) Most times, when I upload APKs, they dont run. Keep getting errors

Avantages

When you work in web development, it's a necessary task to be able to view the websites you design on multiple formats such as phones, tablets, etc. Browserstack allows you to do this in one easy to use interface.

Inconvénients

Occasionally, it takes some time for a specific version/phone model to load up to be ready to preview or it can get stuck.

Avantages

The best part about BrowserStack is its real-time device testing feature. It allows users to test their app or software on a wide range of real devices, which ensures that everything works smoothly before publishing. This feature is incredibly useful for developers who don't have access to multiple devices for testing.

Inconvénients

The only downside I found was the pricing. It feels a bit on the higher side, especially for smaller teams or individual developers.

Avantages

BrowserStack is the go-to troubleshooting resource for web developers who work with users directly. I love the versatility, the ability to see every device, every browser, and all the options.

Inconvénients

Sometimes the user experience, switching between devices and browsers is a bit of a pain, but that's about it.

Avantages

Extensive Browser and Device Coverage
Real Devices
Live Testing
Integrations

Avantages

Browserstack almost provide all the experience of real device. It has ability to test location based functionality, screen recording and other great features that helps specially QA to gather artifacts while testing and recording bugs.

Inconvénients

There is nothing as such that I liked least, however there are areas where there is room for improvement like sessions getting un-interactive after few minutes. Face video calls if possible.

Avantages

What I like the most is it gives us real-time and multiple device options also live testing on an ios emulator, and can easily check by changing the location and rotating the devices, Accessibility testing, Also automation testing so helpful

Inconvénients

Location is very less also on Mac OS animation doesn't work properly n very slow.

Avantages

Huge selection of devices and browser/operating system combination makes it essential to properly investigate on bugs that you couldn't test or find out on your development environment.

Inconvénients

Sometimes the initial connection to the devices navigation is a bit slow or needs a refresh but given the nature of the service it's acceptable.

Avantages

Execution on a real device. The pass % will be close to what experience the user will get.

Inconvénients

Device tier concept while execution makes it a parallel session running a variable number of devices.

Avantages

Responsive testing for UI interfaces and accessibility testing.

Inconvénients

Delay in loading the different devices/browsers while live testing on real devices.

Avantages

What I like is to be able to realize my QA testing in mutiple devices and different versions etc without having a hard time to get physical devices to do it, so Browserstack helps me a lot!

Inconvénients

Input lag sometimes but this is common when it comes to streaming.