Avis clients sur Hired

Avantages

This software is great because you are reaching out to candidates that are already actively looking. It is more effective than any cold reach outs and I find that the quality of candidates is higher caliber as well.

Inconvénients

It is not the easiest tool to navigate and often times, the search strings do not filter the candidates in the most precise way so it requires a lot of extra sorting through.

Avantages

The daily activity, showing you new candidates to review is greta. Knowing skills, experience and salary expectation is a big bonus.

Inconvénients

There could be more features around filtering and sorting candidates.

Avantages

I love love love the UX and how clean it is. Please buy champagne for the UX team as soon as this is read. I love that Hired so clean and readable. Please be diligent in adding new feature as it tends to add noise. Less is more.

Inconvénients

There are key concerns around Product and attention to details.
1) Recycled profiles listed as "New Today" when in fact they've been on the platform multiple times. This is a horrible thing to do and erodes faith in the platform. Why give the enterprise customer the same thing over and over? I've been told by Hired to click the 'hide' button but this is not a reasonable solution. It creates friction in the customer experience and ads to the work flow. Not listing previous profiles as "New Today" is a matter of ethics. Hired needs to eliminate this practice or simply add a different label (i.e. "Returning Today".
2) Profiles are not screened for typos on salary. I often see salary numbers that clearly forgot to add the last zero (i.e. $17,000 instead of presumably 170,000).
3) Very negative impact on recruiting workflows when Hired allows candidates future graduation dates. It gives the impression that someone has a degree that they don't really have (i.e. Master's In Computer Science - Graduation 2020).
4) No clear summary of how much $ was spent and when/what results were. Enterprises should have a dashboard that clearly shows YTD spend/hires/offers/interviews.

Avantages

The functionality is extremely intuitive and easy to use. A great interface makes for a smooth experience.

Inconvénients

Sometimes candidate quality is low. Engineers are sometimes not as strong as needed.

Avantages

Easy to use interface and a big step up from older similar platforms

Inconvénients

As a job seeker in the past, I wasn’t impressed with their depth of resources for marketing related roles and had a few frustrations of being marketed to to use the service then finding no results and little feedback after engaging.

Avantages

The platform itself offers great filtering and an easy to use UI.
Good messaging and contact with candidates.

Inconvénients

I guess I was sold on the Hired pitch, that they had the great candidates. However, in my experience looking to fill a technical role, the candidates generally seemed to be weaker than we could get using traditional hiring routes.

Also, the price for filling a position is astronomical, even among recruiting firms.

Avantages

You just have to create your profile and companies will contact you with an estimate of your salaries. You can choose from a list of departments and also a specific concentration you want to work on. You can also choose which locations you want to work in.

Inconvénients

There are a very few departments mentioned. Most of the major departments aren't even mentioned. Even if you select the listed department, there is no guarantee that the job will be listed in your specified location. Not a lot of jobs available in this software. Poor interface.

Avantages

Ease of use, Ability to set the requested base salary early on, Ability to manage most of your interviews in the same place

Inconvénients

I wish they could integrate with a tool like Calendly

Avantages

It makes it extremely easy to start a dialogue with high quality companies from the perspective of someone looking for a new job. The interface is super easy to use and the vetting process seems to be pretty good.

Inconvénients

Its prohibitively expensive for smaller companies so in a way its not much different from using a recruiter - although I have to admit the quality of the candidates and the companies is generally much higher than when recruiters are used.

Avantages

I like that candidates are primed to interview and eager to find a new role. It's easy to use, adds candidates frequently, and is overall my favorite platform!

Inconvénients

I like using it to find candidates. I could do without some of the back-end work (like marking when a candidate has interviewed) etc.

Avantages

-Best part of this is the relevant and
Specific content related to jobs advertising for the people looking for jobs.

-I have used this earlier for job hunt and surprisingly it’s very good and immediately you will get messages /emails from recruiters all over Who are looking for candidates for your matching skillset
-Properly email communication and interview scheduling process with recruiters which gives transparency to candidate
- Salary/Role/location is clearly mentioned on all jobs mostly which is the best part I mostly liked it
-Timely alerts /popup notifications

Inconvénients

Only concern is about the interview schedule process which seems very fast and didn’t feel comfortable if we don’t have info included like if it will be remote / salary expectations.
So we should have something prerequisite before scheduling interviews with candidates for addressing there concerns

Avantages

It is a great source of active candidates.

Inconvénients

It is another place, in addition to LinkedIn, ATS, and email, where I need to communicate with candidates. Though it integrates with gmail and our ATS, it isn't seamless. Candidates expected Hired calendar invites (vs. how we typically schedule candidates in our regular process). I often have to double enter information.

Active candidates move quickly and Hired is very salary/offer focused. As a smaller, mission-driven company it can be difficult to gain the attention of candidates.

The search/filter functionality isn't great when looking through candidates, and I typically get shown the same candidates over and over again.

Avantages

Overall very happy with Hired. I like being able to see what other interviews candidates have, when searching for suitable candidates, being able to swipe through quickly is useful without having to return to the beginning of the search

Inconvénients

I think it should be standard for candidates to upload a CV along with their profile. A lot of the time profiles are missing useful information that can be found on a CV.

It would also be helpful for all candidates to have to provide availability in their calendars - sometimes waiting for a response to arrange a call can waste a couple of valuable days

Finally, being able to reply from Outlook to messages would be very useful. I spend a lot of time working from my phone when commuting so I can't always log in to Hired.

Avantages

They have a lot of engaged candidates and most of them respond to you. Regardless of a positive or negative response, it's always nice to have people respond to your inquiries.

If you're looking for a full stack/backend/front end engineer then this place has a ton of them. If it's anything specific then a traditional team search would be more appropriate..

Inconvénients

The quality of people us to be better. For some reason, the folks who I am talking to now feel like they haven't really been vetted by anybody. I've even seen some suspicious resume in the site.

Avantages

Hired has good, solid candidates. Good customer success and account management teams as well and an easy to use platform.

Inconvénients

Now Hired's success has almost become it's downfall. Unless you're a top tier company offering the highest levels of comp it's almost impossible to hire a candidate via the platform. Also if your process is not optimally tailored and efficient you'll lose about 90-95% of candidates to other faster companies.

Avantages

It feels in the pipeline of candidates and most candidates are mid-senior which is what we are looking for

Inconvénients

Some of the flows are clunky. Also, the notifications about a candidate being interviewed with other companies are annoying and redundant

Avantages

Always looking for additional signals about candidates moving in the market. If you're trying to stay ahead of the game, Hired is another great tool for your sourcing program.

Inconvénients

There's still a decent amount of crossover with Linkedin Recruiter on folks open to opportunities

Avantages

Ease of use; candidates are very often of really high quality and are 'vetted' thoroughly before they even sign up

Inconvénients

Minor thing, but the calendar does not automatically sync with my timezone... or maybe it's my bad for not having looked at the option!

Avantages

It's god a nice UI
It's easy to use
Nice functionality

Inconvénients

Sometimes it's a little slow
I could do with a refesh (been the same for sometime)

Avantages

This platform provides a great candidate experience. With their ability to put their search criteria up front it also makes it easier for recruiters to know who to reach out to and who to avoid.

Inconvénients

For the comp it would be nice if they would switch to full package expectations vs just salary.

Avantages

I love the easy-to-use functionality of the software. The customer success is amazing as well... Our Account Manager and Customer Success reps are always there when we need them.

Inconvénients

I wish we could still find a number of different roles, rather than JUST technical-focused roles. We do a lot of sales hiring, but understand why this is no longer a functionality for the software.

Avantages

That it has talented individuals to hire. They were generally pretty responsive to the questions asked before an interview request. Those were helpful in determining if a fit was possible.

Inconvénients

The nature of searching feels redundant and dislocated. I also found that the profiles were not in too similar of a form to discern differences among candidates. Some used formatting, some used the form, some were void of helpful information. It was lacking standardization across the profiles.

Avantages

+ Very easy to navigate and good UI
+ Easy to communicate with candidates
+ Transparent comp expectations

Inconvénients

- My biggest con and the only one I really care about is that the quality of the candidate pool isn't consistent. Sometimes there are really good periods and other weeks there's a dry spell.

Avantages

I like we get high-quality candidates and the easy functionality of moving recs through the pipeline.

Inconvénients

Some of my harder to find recs have zero candidates.

Avantages

I like that platform lets the candidates provide ample information on what they are looking for to give you a good sense of potential fit with the company.

Inconvénients

I dislike the new update, I find it more difficult to search candidates not easier. It would be nice to have a stronger search and filter process.